| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Skilling v. United States ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Skilling v. United States
''Skilling v. United States'', , was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the honest services fraud statute, . The court held, in the case involving former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling, that the honest services fraud statute, which prohibits "a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services", covers only bribes and kickback schemes. Ultimately, Skilling's sentence was reduced by 10 years as a result.
== References ==
*Amanda Becker, (Lawyers prepare to reopen 'honest services' cases in wake of Supreme Court ruling ), Washington Post, August 9, 2010
*Artur Davis, (Court could redefine insider trading. ) MarketWatch, March 11, 2011
*Nicholas J. Wagoner, (Honest-Services Fraud: The Supreme Court Defuses the Government's Weapon of Mass Discretion in Skilling v. United States ), South Texas Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 4 (Winter 2010), p. 1121
*Thomas P. Cimino, Jr., Junaid A. Zubairi, Rachel C. Adamczyk, Rachel T. Copenhaver, Vedder Price, (Supreme Court Limits Scope of “Honest Services” Statute - Skilling v. United States ). National Law Review, September 8, 2010
*(Justice Department Seeks a Broader Fraud Law to Cover Self-Dealing ), New York Times, September 28, 2010
*Wesley Burrell, (''The Right-to-Honest-Services Doctrine—Enron’s Final Victim: Pure Void-for-Vagueness in Skilling v. United States'', 44 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1289 (2011). ) Available at: http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol44/iss3/19
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Skilling v. United States」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|